Note: After being accused of highjacking FaceBook posts, I am heeding a suggestion to use a blog.
Recently I noted a relative "Liking" this blog entry on his FB page: The FIVE Ways Women Disrespect Men. In it the author states:
"security is the greatest need for a woman; respect is the biggest need for a man"then lists five ways women disrespect men: Correcting, interrupting, mothering, nagging and manipulating.
After reading it I replied that it was Bronze Age sexism, and wondered why a man deserves respect simply because he has a penis.
So, here's the problem I have with this article and you "liking" it:
1. I was surprised that at the bottom of the article there wasn't a note that said, "This article was reprinted from the June 1912 edition of Ladies Home Journal." How quaint, dated and sad that this article was written in 2012. An article that tells women to just straight out stop nagging, correcting, etc... It might as well have been a line from The Stepford Wives. She doesn't differentiate between husbands, friends, colleagues or associates. No. You (women) will respect ALL men.
2. When I married my wife, I entered a partnership. The preacher said to us, "You two are one". We exchanged wedding bands that symbolize the union: no beginning, no ending.
We are a team. We contribute, we listen, we communicate... we share, discuss and solve. I didn't demand her respect then, and I don't now. She offers respect to those she chooses and disassociates herself with those she doesn't.
The problem for New Testament Christians (for whom the article was written) is "You two are one" runs smack into another favorite biblical wedding verse: Colossians 3:18: "Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the eyes of the lord."
Col3:18 is why this article was written in the first place. Christian wives are ordered to submit.
If this is your ideal of a successful marriage, then you'll have absolutely no idea why I and a growing number of people reject Christianity and religion in general (page 11).
This thinking is backward, sexist, paternalistic and mysoginistic at best. At its worst it's a misguided, twisted justification for spousal abuse and spousal rape. It does however completely reinforce why religion was created in the first place: a way for man to subjugate women.
The quote usually stops right there, because four lines later we get this little gem: Colossians 3:22:
"Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord. 23 Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters, 24 since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as a reward. It is the Lord Christ you are serving. 25 Anyone who does wrong will be repaid for their wrongs, and there is no favoritism."Orderings slave to obey... Kinda restating the submitting wives mandate, doncha think?
3. Your author who you "liked" has created a man that doesn't exist. You see, I (and every other man on this planet) am a very flawed human being.
Now, if your "man" was perfect, and you were still nagging and correcting him, then it may be something you want to work on. When you find that guy, let me know. Otherwise you're stuck with the likes of me, you and every other man on this earth: A guy who at times (correct that...many times) NEEDS to be nagged, interupted and mothered.








